Ignore an Arbitration Clause at Your Peril

Martin CJ has published reasons which should serve as a reminder of the potential consequences of ‘ignoring’ or commencing proceedings in breach of an arbitration clause contained in a contract.

In addition to having the offending proceedings stayed pursuant to the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), the Plaintiff(s) in those proceedings also runs a serious risk of facing an indemnity costs order after a successful stay application.

This is exactly what occurred in KNM Process Systems v Mission Newenergy Ltd.

Paragraph 2 of the Chief Justice’s reasons indicate that whilst an indemnity costs order will not always follow a successful stay application, it does appear that save for any special circumstances an indemnity costs order will usually be made.

It always pays to be mindful whether an arbitration clause applies to any proceedings that you might be considering commencing. If you are unsure, you should seek the opinion of counsel.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: